| As announced by | | | | industry will start seeing morecompetitors in the |
| Microsoft on April 24, 2003, Windows 2003 Server is | | | | budget-hosting segment with servers running on |
| now generally available. | | | | Windows 2003 |
| This means hosting companies will be starting to offer | | | | Server; a segment now only containing a handful of |
| the Windows 2003operating system as an option to | | | | Windows hosts. |
| their clients. | | | | Servers runningopen source operating systems like |
| Digex said, in apress release on April 24, 2003, that | | | | FreeBSD and Linux currently fill the budgethosts |
| they would have "immediate availability of | | | | segment of the market. Microsoft has seen this as an |
| Microsoft Windows Server 2003 within the Digex | | | | issue for a while nowand is expecting the addition of |
| Managed Platforms service line." | | | | the Web Edition to allow more budget |
| Other hosting companies that were contacted have | | | | hostingpackages on the Microsoft operating system. |
| not been so quick to give atime when they would | | | | The trend fornon-Windows based hosting companies |
| have a Windows 2003 package available. | | | | to start deploying services based on the Web |
| It is yet to bedetermined if security concerns over the | | | | Edition of the Windows 2003 Server has already |
| operating system are the reasons behindno official | | | | started thanks to Microsoft's newlicensing and pricing |
| release date being given for new servers using the | | | | structure. One such company to announce plans to |
| new operatingsystem or not. There is no doubt that | | | | startselling servers with Windows Web Edition is |
| everyone has questions about the securityof the new | | | | RackShack.net. |
| software release. | | | | RackShack.nethas been a Red Hat Linux and Cobalt |
| Last year alone,there were many different viruses and | | | | Raq shop since they were started but theyhave |
| worms that propagated though Microsoft'soperating | | | | posted on their site that they would be releasing, on |
| system, causing millions of dollars worth of damage, | | | | May 1, 2003, prices for systems with "Windows Web |
| including Nomadand Code Red. Everyone in the | | | | Edition powered by Ensim." While requests for |
| computer industry is now wondering if Microsofthas | | | | comments sent to RackShack.netwere unanswered in |
| gotten the security right. | | | | time for publication, posts on their user's forum have |
| Microsoft hassaid that Windows 2003 Server is | | | | saidthe cost of the Windows operating system was |
| shipped secure. The reason the product is saidto be | | | | the reason behind them not having |
| secure by Microsoft officials is because in default | | | | Windows dedicated servers in the past. |
| configuration IIS | | | | The real testfor Windows 2003 Server will be if |
| (Internet Information Server) is disabled. Web hosting | | | | developers will want to rush to it or not. |
| companies will have toturn on the web server to | | | | Microsoft said they have made some major stability |
| serve web pages for their clients. The big question isif | | | | changes to IIS 6.0, whichships with Windows 2003 |
| the software will still be secure once the web server is | | | | Server. |
| turned on. | | | | The developersthat were contacted to see if they |
| Security mightbe on every ones mind but hosting | | | | were rushing to get their hands on Windows |
| companies are also looking for the costsavings | | | | 2003 Server did not have definitive answers. One |
| promised by Microsoft. | | | | developer said "I have not hadmuch time to even look |
| Microsoft hasannounced a new Web Edition with the | | | | at the differences so I cannot give an answer to |
| release of the Windows 2003 Server. Thereare no | | | | thatquestion." |
| Client Access Licenses (Calls) and the cost is | | | | One thing is forsure; Microsoft has released its Web |
| significantly less at aprice of $399. The price tag for | | | | Edition of the server to compete againstthe open |
| the Standard Edition is $999, which is the sameas it is | | | | source alternatives. Now Microsoft just has to hope |
| for Windows 2000, says Microsoft's Windows 2000 | | | | developers willbite at the chance to get hosting for |
| site. With a $600dollar per server savings, the hosting | | | | about the same cost as the open sourcealternatives. |