Everything about office supplies and products
 

Welcome to our office supplies Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

Buying and Selling Automobile Dealerships - Limitations When Negotiating the Contract

Buying and Selling Automobile Dealerships there must have been some conduct on the
- Duties Negotiating the ContractDuties part of the accountants linking to that
of and to ShareholdersThe sale of control party or parties, which evidences the
of a corporation at a premium is not in accountants' understanding of that party
and of itself a breach of duty. A or parties' reliance. See: Ultramares v.
"premium" is that amount an investor is Touche and Credit Alliance Corp v. Arthur
willing to pay to gain control of a Anderson and Co.2) The Foreseeability
corporation.But, a sale of control under Approach holds that an accountant is
the following circumstances may be liable to a third party whose reliance on
actionable:1. The sale of control is in the accountant's services was reasonably
effect a disposition of control over a foreseeable to the accountant.
business asset which the corporation may Accordingly, an accountant who prepares
not use to the corporation's advantage. an audit report is liable to a third
Example: if a majority shareholder sells party for negligent misrepresentation if
his shares to a party that is paying a it is reasonably foreseeable that such
premium for control over certain third party might obtain, and rely on,
transactions, but who otherwise would not the audit report. This is an expansive
pay a premium for the corporation itself. view of accountant liability and even a
number of the small group of states that
2. The majority shareholder failed to adopted it, have retreated from it. New
disclose receipt of a premium when a Jersey, for example, passed a more
purchaser attempted to acquire the restrictive statute: N.J. Stat. Section
minority's share; 2A: 53A-25 (L. 1995, 2000).3) The
3. The majority shareholder failed to Restatement Approach adopted over half
disclose favorable employment contracts, the states that holds an accountant is
profit sharing agreements and the like. liable to third party if he supplies
4. If the offer is to purchase all information to a third parties that is
shares at the same price, but the actually foreseen as a user of the
majority first buys-out the minority at a information for a particular purpose. In
lower price, without disclosing the other words, for liability to attach the
higher offer the minority plaintiff must be a member of a limited
shareholder.Although the law is still class to whom the accountant intends to
developing it appears the minority may be supply the information, or to whom the
eliminated at a lower price, if there is accountant knows the recipient intends to
a legitimate business purpose.State case supply it, and who suffers a loss through
and statutory law is diverse on the reliance on the information for
question of minority shareholder rights. substantially the same purposes as the
Given two identical fact situations, a bona fide client. For example, the
sale by majority shareholder could, for accountant may be held liable to a third
example, give rise to a cause of action party lender if the accountant is
in California, while conforming to informed by the client that the audit
Delaware law. In sales involving several report would be used to obtain a loan,
shareholders, the attorneys for each even if the specific lender remains
shareholder should research the question unidentified or the client names one
of "premiums", with respect to both the lender and then borrows from
state of incorporation and the state another.Libel and SlanderEvery
wherein the company's principal place of jurisdiction has statutory definitions
business is located.Duties to Other for libel and slander, the elements of
PurchasersProbably the biggest case in which include a false and unprivileged
this area was a Houston jury's award of publication by writing or orally, which
$7.53 billion in actual damages and $3 has a tendency to injury a person with
billion in punitive damages to Penzoil respect to his office, trade, or
Co. In 1984, Penzoil was negotiating a business. Included are statements
takeover deal with Getty Oil Co., which impugning the competency of a dealer to
Texaco eventually purchased for $10.2 manage the affairs of a dealership.During
billion. Penzoil then sued Texaco for $14 the course of negotiations, a buyer
billion, charging that Texaco coaxed sometimes become frustrated with a
Getty into jilting Penzoil takeover seller's actions and expresses those
deal.Intentional interference with frustrations by impugning the seller's
contractual relations, intentional ability to operate a dealership. Such
interference with prospective business statements, while generally harmless,
advantages and related torts are "hot assume a magnified significance, when the
ticket items" and general and punitive purchaser is negotiating to acquire a
damages are almost unlimited. This financially troubled dealership. At best,
exposure provides another reason both under such circumstances, lenders are
buyer and seller should involve their apprehensive; at worst, they are
attorneys to a greater extent than just neurotic. Invariably, at some point
having them review the Buy-Sell during the negotiations, a purchaser will
Agreement.Opinions as to meet the seller's lender and at that
PerformanceSellers inevitably opine how point in time -- more than any other --
well a dealership will do with additional the prospective purchaser must realize
capital or a new owner and the courts that he has the ability to damage the
have generally supported the adage "No seller and must be disciplined enough to
one can predict the future" and refused be discreet when commenting upon the
to recognize a cause of action based upon seller's status, or abilities, regardless
one party's predictions, to the other of how determined a lender's inquires may
regarding future events, performance, appear.Interference with a Contract or
opinions, or intentions.Statements such Prospective ContractWhether or not a
as "there are no bad franchises -- only prospective buyer becomes the ultimate
bad operators"; the store was "a gold purchaser, the prospect has a duty not to
mine"; or that the buyer would make more intentionally or negligently interfere
money than before have been held "purely with a contract, or, in many states, a
opinion, puffing, or conjecture as to prospective business advantage, of the
future events" and as a matter of law not seller. Again, during the course of
actionable.Automobile dealerships are negotiations, there are occasions when a
anomalies in the field of buying and purchaser is tempted to say or do
selling businesses because by the very something in order to frighten a
nature of the business both parties must competitive bidder and preserve an
be amongst the most knowledgeable people exclusive business opportunity. Such
in the field, as the seller has already actions are proscribed and when called
been qualified by both the factory and a upon to determine the legitimacy of the
financial institution as having that purchaser's actions the courts will
special knowledge and extra skill generally consider the following factors:
necessary to be approved as a dealer; and (a) the conduct (b) the motive; (c) the
the buyer by virtue of the fact that the interests of the other with which the
buyer intends to purchase the dealership actor's conduct interferes; (d) the
has represented that he possessions the interests sought to be advanced by the
knowledge and skill necessary to obtain actor: (e) the social interest in
factory and finance approval, or that protecting the freedom of action of the
someone on his team possesses the actor and the contractual interests of
necessary qualifications.In Denison State the other; (f) the proximity or
Bank v. Madeira the defendant purchased remoteness of the actor's conduct to the
an automobile dealership and in addition interference, and (g) the relationship
to refusing to pay his loan, he between the parties. See Second
cross-complained against the bank Restatement of Torts and Buckaloo v.
alleging the bank misrepresented and Johnson.SummationThe increased dollar
omitted material facts about the value, of dealerships, combined with the
dealership when he purchased it. In higher level of sophistication of today's
reversing a jury verdict against the bank automobile dealer, versus the automobile
the appellate court stated the defendant dealer of twenty years ago, has led to
was a knowledgeable car man and although more dealers being willing to litigate,
he testified he trusted and relied upon when they have been damaged. Recently,
the Bank to furnish him complete, honest that litigation has expanded from dealers
information, he could not abandon all suing manufacturers, to dealers suing
caution and responsibility for his own dealers. If one had to predict the area
protection and unilaterally impose a in which litigation will expand, in the
fiduciary relationship on the bank next ten years, one would have to include
without a conscious assumption of such in that prediction the area surrounding
duties by the bank. See too: Kruse v. buy-sell negotiations.The courts have
Bank of America where the court stated held, time and again, that hard
the plaintiffs could not have reasonably bargaining is part of the American system
expected what they said they expected [Sheehan v. Atlantic International
from the bank's promises and Insurance Co., but they have also noted,
assurances.But Beware: In Martens that the notions of fair play and a sense
Chevrolet, Inc. the owner of the of propriety are also a part of that
dealership was negotiating with the system. [Rich Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton
plaintiffs to sell his dealership and in Development, Inc.] And, while many
response to plaintiff's inquires as to scholars agree that the most successful
the profitability of the dealership the negotiations result in solutions where
owner indicated that it was "mildly both parties, to one degree or another,
profitable" and offered produced a win, the courts recognize that each party
handwritten trend sheet prepared by his not only has a duty to protect their own
accountants supporting the statement and interests and that of their shareholders
stating that the audited statements of [Cosoff v. Rodman (In re W.T. Grant Co.],
the dealership's operations were not but that people who do not affirmatively
complete or available.After the purchase, perform that duty [due diligence], have
the buyer learned that the dealership was no cause of action against their
operated at a loss as reflected in opponents, because the opponents did not
audited statements prepared prior to the perform the duty for them. [See: Dennison
negotiations and sale sued alleging State Bank v. Madeira, 230 Kan. and
breach of contract, deceit and negligent Macon County Livestock Market, Inc. v.
misrepresentation against the former Kentucky State Bank, Inc.].In summation,
owner. The Court assumed a duty existed the negotiation table is a business
between the former owner and the buyer table, at which, both parties are
and reaffirmed the tort of negligent expected to be at their best with respect
misrepresentation against the to preparation, presentation and
dealer.Special Rules for AccountantsThere determination. If one party is lacking in
are three different tests employed by one of the categories, it is not the
other courts to determine what, if any, responsibility of the other party to
duty an accountant has to a third party, supplement the deficiency. To the
in preparing a financial statement for contrary, the participants have a duty to
his own client. These tests were:1) The themselves, their families and to their
Traditional (Ultramares) Approach holds shareholders to obtain the best possible
that before a plaintiff could sue an terms, without unjustly fettering the
accountant he had to have privity, or a opposing party's ability to respond.John
relationship equivalent to privity. The Pico is a vice president of Automotive
Plaintiff must establish (a) the Advisors. He has completed over 1,000
accountants must have been aware that the dealership transactions, and published
financial reports were to be used for a the first books copyrighted in the
particular purpose or purposes; (b) in Library of Congress on Buying and Selling
the furtherance of which a know party or Automobile dealerships.
parties was intended to rely; and (c)




www.quartetmfg.com keyword stats [2007-08-06-2007-08-06]


Other search phrases:

used office supplies houston viking office products
discount desk & office supply free product key for microsoft office
microsoft office 2004 product key largest office supply companies
total office products microsoft office web parts and
home office desk accessories medical office equipment for sale
grove office supply quill office product
capital office products used office equipment philadelphia
office supply business card outlook information store
office computer desk office supply store brooklyn
home & home office store com ch products desk
office supplies industry product key for office 2003 small
law office products office star products pomona ca
office desk parts





1 - A - B - C - D - E - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 -